Now This

This blog is now read by more machines than humans: RSS robots, spam-laying insectopoids, echoes of blog-gathering .edu projects. This essentially is the state of affairs that all human activities w

Cleaning Up the Nation

Austin Bay:

If Air America were a conservative radio network its corrupt funding trail and cynical abuse of a poverty program would be front page news at the NY Times and full-time mega-scandal at

Rank Materialism

Freedom. I am now the proud new owner of a Gateway 6020GZ laptop, perfect for students and others with limited means. I can now go into a Starbucks or a Barnes & Noble and look like I'm doing some

Fallujah Fonda

Uh-oh. From the Telegraph comes this exciting news:

Jane Fonda is returning to anti-war activism and embarking on a cross-country tour to call for an end to US military operations in Iraq.

Acros

John Pilger: Partner in Terrorism

In an outrageous piece of terrorist propaganda appearing on the cover of today's New Statesman, John Pilger puts the blame for the 7/7 London attacks not on the terrorists, but rather on Tony Blair:

From Multiculturalism to Anti-Americanism in Six Easy Steps

There is a connection between multiculturalism and anti-Americanism. But how can acceptance of the fact that there are no absolutes when it comes to cultural truths lead to hatred of the United States? Follow along and see. We start with a simple and widely accepted axiom.

1. We Cannot Judge Other Cultures
This much is obvious to anyone who ever went to college. Who are we to judge what's right for others or to decide what the best way for them to live is? How do we know our own way is best? There is no meaningful measuring stick one can use to judge other cultures by; ergo they cannot be judged. We must accept all of them for what they are and look at them without Western prejudice. Our Western notions cannot serve us here.

2. Therefore, All Cultures Are Equally Good
Since cultures cannot be judged, we must assume- and believe- that each is equally deserving of our respect, forbearance, and even admiration. Differing concepts of property rights, the role of women, the respect due authority, individuality, honor, justice- all are equally valid. Vastly different family structures, and economic structures, are merely different local flavors of no qualitative significance. We must celebrate diversity, even in political systems.

3. If Another Society Is Seen to Have Problems, It Cannot be Because of the Local Culture
Clearly people are being politically oppressed in the Middle East, starving in Africa, and suffering economic instability in South America, to name just three big problems. To solve problems, we must first identify causes. We must discover what's wrong. But we already know that cultures cannot be judged and are all equally deserving of admiration. There's nothing "wrong" with any of them. To say that this particular problem is caused by this particular aspect of their culture is to say that the culture is not as good in this particular way, and we've already established that we cannot do that. So the root cause of a society's problems cannot be found within the society or culture itself.

4. Therefore, the Problem Must Have an External Origin
Since we've ruled out the possibility that a society's problems come from the society itself, obviously their problems come from outside the society. Well, duh. Problems are bad, cultures are good- and a good thing cannot produce a bad thing.

5. We Can Judge Western Culture, and it Obviously has Many Problems
As is implied by Step No. 1, "We Cannot Judge Other Cultures", we are perfectly free to judge our own culture, Western culture, and that of its most visible agent, the US. And we're not just free to do so, indeed, we're obligated to do so. Like the first step, this is axiomatic. And when we do analyze Western and US culture, what a magnificent host of pathologies we find: racism, sexism, homophobia, imperialism, capitalism, corporatism, consumerism, and the chronic trashing of the environment. I could go on in this way for a while, but you get the idea. No shortage of root causes here.

6. Therefore, If Another Society Is Shown to Have Problems, it Must be Because of Western Culture
Problems abound in the world, but the various cultures of the world are clearly blameless, save one. If there is only one culture on the planet which has demonstrable faults, then clearly all the societal problems on the planet must have this culture as their source. Of course, it is Western culture. And as the most Western, most powerful, and least apologetic nation in the Western world, the vast majority of Western culture's crimes can be attributed to the United States of America. QED.

As empirical proof of this, it can be shown that any society which currently faces problems has current, or failing that, has had previous interactions with the US. This supports the view that all problems flow from contact with, or interference from, the US and its culture. The correlation (100% of countries have problems and 100% of countries have had United States involvement) is impossible to ignore.

There is a flaw in all of this. If we cannot judge other cultures because of a lack of absolute measures, how is is possible to judge Western culture itself? Against what is it being measured, and found wanting? Well, perfection, of course, though what constitutes perfection varies from person to person. The idealized Western culture. A perfect United States.

So multiculturalists accept other cultures for what they are (expectation differential: zero) and judge Western culture against perfect ideals (expectation differential: very negative). Of course we place last in that calculation. The worst!

Trackbacks

Comments

Too true. I've actually heard people reason like this. Fortunately, like all relativist, post-modern, transnational, Leftist, Marxist, etc attempts at reasoning, it is invariably self-referential in some way.

By the reasoning you have put forth, *every* proper multiculturalist is forced to conclude that all the world's problems are caused by their own culture. An "Arab multiculturalist" (if there could be such a thing) would have to conclude that the only culture he can judge ("Arab" culture) is to blame for all the world's ills.

Extend that far enough, and the only thing multiculturists everywhere can universally conclude is that their own culture- i.e. multiculturism, is to blame for all the world's ills.

Greg: Multiculturalism is itself a part of Western culture, an irony probably lost on most multiculturalists. It is only evil Western culture which has enabled them to see how evil Western culture is. Quite a paradox. And as you suggest, we won't ever see any Arab multiculturalists because to be multiculturalist is to be Western. It would be great if multiculturalism spread to other cultures which could then analyze and criticize themselves (so wouldn't have to), but then that would be cultural imperialism! Another paradox.

The idea of multiculturalism arose in Western culture, but it is not an intrinsic part of Western culture, no more so than Marxism.

Go to any college campus these days and you will have no trouble finding folks who are most definitely not Western in values and culture who claim to argue from the morally elevated platform of multuculturalism. There are no shortage of claimants that the ideals of multiculturalism translate across cultural boundaries. Take that to it's extreme, and you get my first comment.

Or to put it another way, multiculturalism is a culture and as such is therefore no more inherently correct than any other.

My culture tells me I can judge other cultures, and my culture is just as valid as any other. Anyone saying otherwise is just subscribing to a different, but definitely not more valid, culture.

I disagree that multiculturalism is a culture- it's a school of thought, and a very Western one. Parts of it are in line with mainstream Western culture: self-criticism being of prime importance. But whereas in the Western tradition we engage in self-criticism in order to improve society, multiculturalists are more interested in rote condemnation of the West or of the US and favor other cultures uncritically. No, it's not intrinsic to Western culture, but it is Western.

In a like manner, Marxism had Western origins but isn't intrinsic to Westernism. It's a great irony of history that non-Western states that adopted Marxism thought themselves anti-Western but used Western ideas to get there. It's the same with multiculturalism: anti-Western, but Western. Multiculturalism isn't an alien other- it's more of a disease from within.

One would have to accept your first premise in order to accept the rest of what you say.

I don't know where you attended university, but that was not taught at the universities I attended, not in sociology, anthropology or history.

Jane: Yes, the conclusion flows from the first premise.

With my statement "This much is obvious to anyone who ever went to college," I didn't mean to imply that all college instruction is from a multiculturalist perspective, but you're really lucky if you've never came across it- especially if you took any courses run by the English or women's or any of the various ethnic departments.

In any case, I've heard some professors mention that incoming freshmen already subscribe to the first premise. The multiculturalist attitude is not to be found only in academia.

Check for new comments.

Add Your Comment

Name (required)

Email (not required, not displayed)

Web (optional - will be linked)

Comment (max 4000 characters)


Reload Image

Enter Code

Top Tags
Archives