This blog is now read by more machines than humans: RSS robots, spam-laying insectopoids, echoes of blog-gathering .edu projects. This essentially is the state of affairs that all human activities w
Cleaning Up the Nation
Austin Bay:
If Air America were a conservative radio network its corrupt funding trail and cynical abuse of a poverty program would be front page news at the NY Times and full-time mega-scandal at
Rank Materialism
Freedom. I am now the proud new owner of a Gateway 6020GZ laptop, perfect for students and others with limited means. I can now go into a Starbucks or a Barnes & Noble and look like I'm doing some
Fallujah Fonda
Uh-oh. From the Telegraph comes this exciting news:
Jane Fonda is returning to anti-war activism and embarking on a cross-country tour to call for an end to US military operations in Iraq.
Acros
John Pilger: Partner in Terrorism
In an outrageous piece of terrorist propaganda appearing on the cover of today's New Statesman, John Pilger puts the blame for the 7/7 London attacks not on the terrorists, but rather on Tony Blair:
Not in Their Names
Admiral Stansfield Turner's Ten Steps to Fight Terrorism Without Endangering Democracy, written a few weeks after 9/11:
1. Assassinations are neither an appropriate nor an effective counter-terrorist tactic.
2. Punitive military attacks are a remedy we should use, but sparingly.
3. Covert actions should be undertaken, but judiciously, because the probability of success is low.
4. Rescue operations have a role but will continue to be highly risky for the United States.
5. Improved intelligence, especially human, is always desirable but difficult to achieve.
6. Restraint of the media could be helpful, but modest self-restraint is the most we can expect.
7. Economic sanctions should be used against state sponsors of terrorism, even if they take a long time to be effective.
8. Defensive security is unlikely to receive sufficient attention or money.
9. Deals are an option we cannot rule out.
10. Legal recourse is the option most compatible with American values.
So he's bearish on everything but economic sanctions, cutting deals, and legal remedies. Harrumph. It sounds like Clinton's foreign policy to me. I say, thanks, but no thanks.
Now he's signed on to the Diplomats and Military Commanders for Change statement called The Need for Change in U.S. Foreign and Defense Policy. It should be called The Need for Rollback in U.S. Foreign and Defense Policy. (Wait, you can't say that without having read the damn thing.) (Right, like what's in it is going to be a surprise.) Oh, and a tip to the Military Commanders for Change: your statement would be more compelling if you chucked the Diplomats for Change.
Short URL: http://spartac.us/155
Trackback URL: http://blog.spartac.us/trackback/155
Trackbacks take up to one hour to be displayed.
© 2002-2006
Brian O'Connell.




Trackbacks