Now This

This blog is now read by more machines than humans: RSS robots, spam-laying insectopoids, echoes of blog-gathering .edu projects. This essentially is the state of affairs that all human activities w

Cleaning Up the Nation

Austin Bay:

If Air America were a conservative radio network its corrupt funding trail and cynical abuse of a poverty program would be front page news at the NY Times and full-time mega-scandal at

Rank Materialism

Freedom. I am now the proud new owner of a Gateway 6020GZ laptop, perfect for students and others with limited means. I can now go into a Starbucks or a Barnes & Noble and look like I'm doing some

Fallujah Fonda

Uh-oh. From the Telegraph comes this exciting news:

Jane Fonda is returning to anti-war activism and embarking on a cross-country tour to call for an end to US military operations in Iraq.

Acros

John Pilger: Partner in Terrorism

In an outrageous piece of terrorist propaganda appearing on the cover of today's New Statesman, John Pilger puts the blame for the 7/7 London attacks not on the terrorists, but rather on Tony Blair:

Make War, Not Love

Seems everybody has a comment on Andrew Sullivan's recent post disavowing support for Bush in November. Here's another. While I agree with Andrew and most conservatives that the expansion of entitlement spending under the administration is outrageous, and I agree with Andrew and most liberals that Bush's late support for the Federal Marriage Amendment is outrageous, to me this doesn't translate into not voting for Bush in November.

On spending, it's likely that Kerry would spend as much or more, and raise taxes to boot. This is not a better alternative. I'm not a deficit hawk- I don't think it matters very much.

On gay marriage, Kerry's also against it, though he's also against the FMA. I have to take a practical approach here. I'm for gay marriage, but most of the people I know who are against it are also against amending the Constitution. It has no real chance. So while Bush's support for the FMA is distressing on a symbolic level, it doesn't have any practical policy effects.

It does seem to me, spending arguments aside, that Sullivan is one-issuing the FMA question. That's his choice, of course. As for me, and many others, the one issue that I'll be taking into the voting booth is the war. Kerry would not be the disaster as commander-in-chief that many are saying; the realities of that role often transmogrify campaign promises into so much hot air (as we've seen with Bush himself). But while Kerry would play the role of adequate caretaker, I think only Bush will continue to push it forward. And that's what's needed.

If the Democrats nominate someone in 2008 who is serious about bringing the war to our enemies, or if the Republicans nominate someone who is more liberal on social issues, then both Andrew and I and the many liberal hawks and neocons in this country will have a more perfect candidate to vote for. But until and unless that happens, I've got to go with the socially conservative hawk over the socially liberal dove, relatively speaking. It's not a tough call.

Trackbacks

Comments

Check for new comments.

Add Your Comment

Name (required)

Email (not required, not displayed)

Web (optional - will be linked)

Comment (max 4000 characters)


Reload Image

Enter Code

Top Tags
Archives